top of page

Copyright © 2026. All rights reserved.

Services

Attack Surface Review

Attack Simulation

Compliance Gap Review

Security Baseline

Security Architecture

Security Operations Oversight

Virtual CISO

Security Risk & Decision Management

Security Certification Program

Resources

Insights

Blog / news

Events

Resources

We bring clarity to cybersecurity, helping organizations navigate complexity, make confident decisions and innovate with confidence.

header

Blog

Get to know all our latest news and learn from our knowledge

How to Align ISO 27001, NIS2 and SOC 2 Compliance

Jun 11, 2024
4 min read

ISO 27001:2022 transition deadlines, NIS2 pressure, and SOC 2 buyer expectations are converging. Here is why growing companies should start now, and what to do first.


Security compliance rarely becomes easier when everyone waits.


For growing companies, the next pressure point is already visible. ISO 27001 certificates are moving to the 2022 version, NIS2 has raised the bar for many EU-facing organisations, and SOC 2 remains a common requirement in sales due diligence. None of these efforts should be treated as a last-minute paperwork exercise.


The practical answer is to start earlier, scope carefully, and build one security management system that can support several obligations at once.


Wide-angle view of a mountain path marked with several dated signposts.
The transition is easier when the route is visible early.

The deadline pressure is real


ISO 27001:2022 was published on 25 October 2022, replacing the 2013 edition. The transition period gives organisations time to move, but it is not open-ended.


That date matters because certification bodies, consultants, internal teams, and auditors all face the same rush. Waiting until the final months can mean limited audit availability, compressed remediation time, and more expensive decisions.


NIS2 adds another layer. It is not an ISO standard, and it is not the same as SOC 2. Even so, it pushes many organisations toward stronger governance, supplier risk management, incident handling, and management accountability.


For companies selling across Europe, ISO27001 and NIS2 now often sit in the same conversation. Buyers, insurers, regulators, and boards want evidence that security is managed, not improvised.

ISO 27001:2022 is more than a certificate update


The 2022 edition keeps the familiar management system model, but the control set has changed. Annex A now contains 93 controls, grouped into four themes: organisational, people, physical, and technological.


The work is not just mapping old controls to new ones. Teams need to review the risk assessment, Statement of Applicability, policies, supplier controls, cloud practices, logging, threat intelligence, and incident processes.


For a smaller company, that may sound heavy. In practice, the best approach is usually simple:


  • define the scope clearly

  • identify real risks

  • collect evidence as teams work

  • fix gaps before the audit calendar becomes tight


A lightweight but well-run management system is far better than a large set of documents no one uses.


Close-up view of coloured control cards arranged beside a small hourglass.
Control mapping takes time when evidence is still immature.

SOC 2 can share the same foundation


SOC 2 is not interchangeable with ISO 27001, but much of the evidence overlaps. Access reviews, asset inventories, vendor checks, change records, backups, incident response, and security monitoring can support both.


The difference is in the assurance model. ISO 27001 certifies a management system against an international standard. SOC 2 reports on controls related to trust service criteria over a chosen period, often requested by customers during procurement.


The mistake is to run them as two separate projects. That doubles work and creates inconsistent answers for buyers.


A better model is to build a common control library, then map evidence to each requirement. This keeps compliance, ISO, NIS2 work connected to the same operating practices.


NIS2 raises expectations for leadership


NIS2 is especially relevant because it focuses on governance and responsibility. It expects organisations in scope to manage cyber risk with suitable technical and organisational measures.


It also introduces meaningful enforcement levels.


Under NIS2, maximum administrative fines can reach at least €10,000,000 or 2% of worldwide annual turnover for essential entities, and €7,000,000 or 1.4% for important entities, whichever is higher.

The point is not to panic. The point is to avoid treating security compliance as a document pack owned only by IT. Leadership needs visibility into risk acceptance, incident readiness, supplier exposure, and audit commitments.


For growing companies, that often means creating a simple monthly security rhythm:


  • review top risks

  • track open corrective actions

  • approve policy changes

  • monitor supplier and customer commitments

  • test incident response assumptions


Eye-level view of a locked metal gate on a quiet industrial service road.
Governance works best when responsibilities are clear before pressure arrives.

Starting now reduces rework


A rushed compliance project usually creates three problems.


First, the scope becomes too broad or too vague. That leads to evidence gaps and needless audit findings.


Second, documents get written after the fact. Auditors and buyers can tell when policies do not reflect real work.


Third, teams discover dependencies too late. Identity controls, supplier reviews, logging, asset lists, and incident drills need time to mature.


Starting earlier gives the company room to make practical choices. Some controls can be simple at first. For example, smaller teams may begin with quarterly access reviews before moving to more frequent checks for high-risk systems. The key is to document the decision and connect it to risk.


What to do next


Use the next few weeks to turn uncertainty into a plan. The aim is not to finish everything at once. It is to avoid losing control of timing.


  1. Confirm your scope


    Decide which entities, products, teams, systems, and locations are included. Keep the first scope defensible and useful.


  2. Map requirements once


    Build a single control map for ISO 27001:2022, SOC 2, and relevant NIS2 obligations. Reuse evidence where it is valid.


  3. Run a gap assessment


    Check policies, access controls, suppliers, incident response, logging, asset management, and risk ownership. Rank gaps by audit and business impact.


  4. Book the transition path early


    Speak with your certification body or auditor well before the 31 October 2025 deadline. Audit capacity will matter.


  5. Create a management rhythm


    Review risks, actions, and evidence every month. Small, steady progress beats a rushed clean-up before audit.


Overhead view of a paper checklist beside a compass and numbered stones.
A short plan helps teams move from intent to evidence.

The window is tightening, but there is still time to act well. Start with scope, map the overlaps, fix the highest-risk gaps, and give the audit process enough time to run properly.


Enhance Your Security Compliance Today!

Are you ready to take your organization's security compliance to the next level? Our comprehensive Security Compliance Program is designed to help you navigate the complexities of compliance requirements effortlessly.


With tailored solutions and expert guidance, you can safeguard your business and build trust with your clients.


Don't wait any longer! Explore our Security Compliance Program and discover how we can help you achieve peace of mind and regulatory success.


 
 
footer
Banner mobile

Let’s protect what matters most

Tell us about your challenges and we’ll guide you through the solution

bottom of page